Friday, February 23, 2007

Educated mohammedans more jihadi than others

feb 21st, 2007

now why is this a surprise?

the educated ones simply have more wherewithal to carry out their fantasies of global conquest. education does not make them any less fanatical. same thing with wealth. observe that as mohammedan states grow richer, they become more and more bigoted: eg. malaysia.

and in india, it is the educated ones who are *keeping* the poor mohammedans poor, illiterate and liable to explode at a moment's notice. this is how they extort all sorts of things from the state, by threatening to let loose these storm troopers. i am talking about the likes of

1. 'a famous social activist and actress who became the second wife of some guy when his first wife was still alive, thus exemplifying the idea of being progressive when it suits her and medieval when it suits her -- a good example of al taqiyya in action'

2. 'a famous us-based editor whose family has fattened at the mammaries of the indian state, but who now trashes india at every chance he gets',

et al who know exactly how to enrich themselves at the expense of poor mohammedans and others.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jy

Editorials & Opinions
Investor's Business Daily
Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Global Jihad: A new Gallup poll finds that richer,
better-educated Muslims are more likely to be
radicalized. This explodes the myth of the poor, dumb
terrorist.

Since 9/11, the politically correct elite have
mau-maued Americans into thinking the terrorists have
hijacked a peaceful religion out of ignorance and
poverty. Or that they've been brainwashed by Osama bin
Laden.

But Gallup found the opposite to hold true: The most
radical among Muslims -- those who support jihad --
earn more and stay in school longer. These are the
smart ones, not the rubes.

Surely there must be some mistake. Perhaps Gallup's
sample was too small. Actually, its surveys represent
more than 90% of Muslims. They were carried out in
2006 and 2005 in 10 predominantly Muslim countries.
About 10,000 Muslims were polled.

Statistics aside, there's plenty of anecdotal evidence
to support the findings. Look at the backgrounds of
some of the world's most notorious Muslim terrorists:

o Bin Laden, the son of a Saudi billionaire, studied
engineering.

o His deputy Ayman al-Zawahri is an eye surgeon.

o Mohamed Atta, the son of a lawyer, earned a
master's degree in urban planning.

o 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed graduated
from an American college with an engineering degree.

o Flight 93 pilot Ziad Jarrah's father is a Beirut
bureaucrat who drove a Mercedes and put his son
through prep school.

Some of the London bombers had college degrees. One
was a schoolteacher. Another's father owned a store.

Many of the Saudi hijackers were the best and
brightest in their towns. Hani Hanjour, who crashed
the plane into the Pentagon, studied English at the
University of Arizona. Family members were wealthy
merchants from Taif, a resort city in Saudi Arabia.

Most Palestinian suicide bombers have come from
middle-class homes. They didn't do what they did to
escape poverty.

And some of the most radical imams in America have
doctorates.

Gallup merely backs with statistics what we already
knew. Contrary to liberal dogma, education makes
Muslims only more extreme, not more moderate.
Education doesn't stop terrorism.

Inviting more Muslims to our shores in the hopes
they'll embrace our culture and adopt our values also
seems misguided.

Yet this is the logic behind the White House's deal to
grant 21,000 student visas to young Saudi men over the
next four years. It's been sold as a cultural exchange
program.

But do we really want to educate thousands of Saudis
on our campuses if education helps only to radicalize
Muslims?

Gallup's survey of Muslims, the largest conducted,
puts to rest theories that radicals attack us because
they're poor and alienated from society. Or because
they're dim and easily misled.

Radical Muslims have an education and an economic
future, yet they still hate. They're literate enough
to interpret their holy books, yet they still embrace
jihad against infidels.

Perhaps the only sane course in this war is to
separate the West from Islam.

http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=256953989637817

No comments: