Monday, July 09, 2007

The danger of deep religosity

article
As always, Swapan on the money. The shameless non-PM did not lose sleep last year when over 250 Indians were killed in the Mumbai train blast. With their pet theories on terrorism crumbling, now all the seculars in India including the non-PM want all Indians to be painted as terrorists along with the Pakis, just because Muslim 'Indians' are involved in terrorism.

5 comments:

bly243001 said...

Tavleen Singh has even more poignant and hard-hitting column on puppet minister's secular insomnia.
Specially read about the part about PM's unemotional visit to victims of Mumbai's train blasts.

bly243001 said...

Here is the link

Tavleen Singh

siva said...

This MMS bastard did not hesitate to insinuate, “involvement of Hindu groups are not ruled out” during last years Malageon blasts. This is when there was no evidence of any kind was available and even if there were evidence so is it ok to say Hindu groups but not Islamic terrorists? Freakin shameless dhimmi.

Sorry for the language, I cannot take it any more.

Hindu Fundamentalist said...

OT: archealogical evidence supports genetic theory of migration from africa to india. no aryans thundering down the khyber pass in their chariots.

http://www.hindu.com/2007/07/09/stories/2007070955141300.htm

In the Science paper, the researchers noted that the techniques used for making the stone tools at Jwalapuram suggested “closer affinities” to African Middle Stone Ages traditions than to contemporaneous Eurasian ones. T his finding is significant because genetic studies of tell-tale patterns in the DNA of people living in various parts of the world have supported the view that all modern humans arose in Africa.

It is believed that these modern humans then migrated out of Africa and settled all across the globe.

“So what we are saying is that modern humans probably dispersed from Africa into India at a very early date, earlier than anyone has suggested before,” Dr. Petraglia told this correspomndent.

karyakarta92 said...

http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/jul/06glasgow2.htm

There we go again ! The mainstream dhimmi Indian media has once again
resurrected the "Muslim as victim" excuse.

Those bloodthirsty Hindoos. Not only are they practising genocide against
poor & uneducated muslims in Gujarat & Kashmir, now they're also radicalising
those poor & uneducated muslims to export jihad to Britain & Australia.

The mainstream dhimmi western media is repeatedly describing the
muslim doctors as "Indian doctors", "of East Indian origin" etc. Now, they cannot dare label them as "Muslims", can they ?

Evidently, India is a muslim country. It makes no difference to the Atlanticists
or the Gunga-Din's anyway.

And, shikhandi MMS has explicitly requested that no terrorist be named as a Muslim.
Perfect - now we Hindus can all share the INDIA/SOUTH ASIA solidarity with these muslim terrorists and get painted in the same brush.

I would expect some coverage on BBC, CNN, PBS etc on the Hindoo
victimization of muslims in India very soon. And, bet on a suitable dhimmi like Sudheendra Kulkarni being asked to provide some insights from a Hindoo perspective.

Now, of course it would be expecting way too much from the Gunga-din government of India to make any effort even on "secular" issues like getting back the $600 million in annual contributions from H1B workers with Indian nationality to the U.S Social Security System.

But, can they kindly stop this nonsense about "labeling" and "isolating" muslims immediately ?
Otherwise, they will be contributing to the real labeling and isolation of us "East Indians" in the west.

Whereas, it is ok to explicitly use the label "Indian" and "Hindu woman" in this case (in Gujarat).

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6274318.stm

When did the BBC/CNN last describe Anna Nicole Smith as a "Christian stripper" ?

With the BBC, any bad news from India is news. Note that these are the same people who sneeringly reported on the muslim terrorist bombing of SankatMochan Mandir, Varanasi with the comment that Hindus were worshipping their "monkey god" at the time, as if they somehow deserved it.

They can barely conceal their glee when reporting bad news about India/Hindus.
It is definitely derived from the christist principle of condescension.

Which leads to the conclusion that all these "isms" are all diluted
forms of the same semitic cult.

Christism = Mohammedanism - Muhammad

Marxism = Christism - Christ

Western Liberalism = Marxism - Marx/Mao