Friday, October 31, 2008

Indonesian parliament passes anti-porn bill

oct 30th, 2008

the idea is to restrict non-mohammedan thought. hindus have warned that dance, music etc. will be under the purview of this bill. so will images of hindu deities.

taliban wins again.

and what is the kkkangress government doing about this? nada, zilch, nothing.

what did the kkkangress government do when mohammedan malaysis banned the hindu human rights group? nada, zilch, nothing.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Shahryar


 

Indonesian parliament passes anti-porn bill

Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:18am GMT
 
By Olivia Rondonuwu and Telly Nathalia
 
JAKARTA (Reuters) - Indonesia's parliament on Thursday passed an anti-pornography bill, despite strong opposition from minority groups who consider it a threat to artistic, religious, and cultural freedom.
 
The anti-porn bill was pushed by a small group of Islamist parties in predominantly Muslim, but officially secular, Indonesia, and its passage was greeted by claps and shouts of "Allahu Akbar," or "God is great" from supporters in parliament.
 
Indonesia will hold parliamentary and presidential elections next year, and few politicians are willing to risk upsetting the smaller Islamist parties as these could play an important role in forming coalitions.
 
However, some Indonesians, particularly the Hindu and Christian minorities, see the anti-porn bill as a sign of creeping intolerance when it comes to religious and cultural differences, with the agenda increasingly influenced by hardline Muslim groups.
 
Balkan Kaplale, head of the parliamentary committee which drafted the bill, said the legislation was necessary given the increasing immorality of Indonesian society, as shown by the rise in adultery cases and use of obscene language.
 
"If Christians put a suit on dead bodies and Muslims put on a white shroud, why can't the living do that?" said Kaplale, a member of parliament for President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono's Democrat Party, in a recent interview with Reuters.
 
"If a husband and wife are in one room, nobody is prohibiting it, because it's pleasure, but legal. What is being protested is if they are not husband and wife...that must not happen."
 
Two members of parliament were fired by their parties in the last year or so, following scandals in which they were caught in adulterous relationships on mobile phone cameras.
 
Earlier this month, news that a wealthy Muslim cleric had taken a 12-year-old girl as his second wife prompted a public outcry.
The matter is under investigation by the authorities.
 
TOO VAGUE
In the final legislation, pornography is described as "pictures, sketches, photos, writing, voice, sound, moving picture, animation, cartoons, conversation, gestures, or other communications shown in public with salacious content or sexual exploitation that violate the moral values of society."
 
Offenders face up to 15 years imprisonment. The maximum penalty for lending or downloading pornographic material is four years in jail or a 2 billion rupiah ($189,600) fine.
 
The bill, which has been under discussion for years, has sparked protests and acrimonious debate, particularly in predominantly Hindu Bali, a resort island which depends heavily on tourism, because of concerns about the impact on local artists and foreign visitors.
 
Critics say that the exceptions to the bill for sexually explicit cultural and artistic material are too vague, and that by allowing civil organizations to play a role in preventing pornography, this could open the door for vigilante groups to take the law into their own hands.
 
It is not just Indonesians who have expressed concerns about the controversial bill. Several foreign governments, including Denmark, the United States, and the Philippines, have sent official letters of enquiry.
 
"I told them your country has porn bill, so why do you interfere so much here," Kaplale said.
 
(Editing by Sara Webb and Samjeev Miglani)
 
 
© Thomson Reuters 2008. All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only.


1 comment:

karyakarta92 said...

Sad to see a relatively tolerant country with an ancient Hindu heritage getting Talibanised. It was a matter of time, though. Someone said it very succinctly that "WHERE THE FOOT OF ISLAM FALLS, THE VERY GRASS WITHERS"

While the Indonesian Mullahs there have the audacity to equate sacred Hindu religious icons with PORNOGRAPHY, what do the bloody "SECULARISTS" of India
have to say about the REAL BLASPHEMOUS PORNOGRAPHY
of that M.F Hussain? The low life "SECULAR" vermin grant awards
to him. Therefore, activist Hindus
need to bring that debauched lacerous PORNOGRAPHER to justice.

Approximately 100 years ago, expatriate Hindu nationalists such as Madan Lal Dhingra made heavy sacrifices to punish genocidal limey colonialists on British soil.
It would be a fitting tribute to the memory of those martyrs if Hindu nationalists today can bring that M.F to justice. Smoke that
M.F out of his cave in Londonistan or wherever he is hiding. And ensure by whatever means necessary that even the macabre mor(t)al remains of the bloody pervert are never allowed on the soil of the Mother India that he dares paint so disrespectfully.

I promise to publicly distribute sweets to celebrate the riddance of M.F, wherever I may be located physically..