they just figured this out *now*? goodness, does the bear do its thing in the woods? is ratzy catholic? is the ISI the taliban?
yes, san did post this below. but i am wondering why this atlanticist paper has suddenly jumped on this bandwagon. remember that just last week the wsj had published a glowing (but idiotic) story about how there was this great relationship between the ISI-turned-army-chief kiyani and top US army brass. what, that yank admiral mullen was an idiot, or what?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123759845485301419.html
i think the nytimes is trying to make the wsj look bad, that's about it.
everybody in the yank establishment knows taliban == ISI. they only maintain this polite fiction that they are different to hoodwink the very willing-to-be-hoodwinked manmohan singh.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Girish
From: Girish
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/world/asia/26tribal.html?_r=1&bl&ex=1238212800&en=7f09c3808c52ec7d&ei=5087%0AAfghan Strikes by Taliban Get Pakistan Help, U.S. Aides Say... deleted |
No comments:
Post a Comment