what can you expect from something written by that sex-crazed wendy doniger? she sees sex in everything. so do her 'children' like courtwright. these people are great candidates for psycho-analysis. or maybe even a little surrogate sex therapy.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <bhailal@aol.com>
Date: 2009/8/26
Subject: Hinduism Misinterpreted: Encyclopædia Britannica insults Hinduism-Amit Raj Dhawan-23 August 2009
To:
Hinduism Misinterpreted: Encyclopædia Britannica insults Hinduism-Amit Raj Dhawan-23 August 2009
http://www.vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplayArticle.aspx?id=768
This article will highlight some of the misinterpretations of Hinduism in Encyclopædia Britannica, many of which are very offending to any Hindu reader and those who know and respect Hinduism. The author has based this article on the contents of [1]. Text quoted from Encyclopædia Britannica 2009 Student and Home Edition is in slanted red typeface. In the following lines an argument is presented, which shows and questions the biased intentions of a popular reference source like Encyclopædia Britannica. Information conveyed by an encyclopedia should be unbiased, impartial, based on facts, true to the greatest extent, and not anybody's personal opinion. In this light, the article on Hinduism in Encyclopædia Britannica has been examined. The absurd choice of contributors of an article on Hinduism by the authorities of Encyclopædia Britannica will also be analysed. It is felt that Britannica's article on Hinduism is written in a sense that ill-disposes a reader towards Hinduism, whereas this is not the case with Britannica's articles on other religions like Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. After thought and analysis, I have been left with an impression which can be bes t summarized in the following question: Why is Encyclopædia Britannica hostile towards Hinduism?20
... deleted
From: <bhailal@aol.com>
Date: 2009/8/26
Subject: Hinduism Misinterpreted: Encyclopædia Britannica insults Hinduism-Amit Raj Dhawan-23 August 2009
To:
Hinduism Misinterpreted: Encyclopædia Britannica insults Hinduism-Amit Raj Dhawan-23 August 2009
http://www.vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplayArticle.aspx?id=768
This article will highlight some of the misinterpretations of Hinduism in Encyclopædia Britannica, many of which are very offending to any Hindu reader and those who know and respect Hinduism. The author has based this article on the contents of [1]. Text quoted from Encyclopædia Britannica 2009 Student and Home Edition is in slanted red typeface. In the following lines an argument is presented, which shows and questions the biased intentions of a popular reference source like Encyclopædia Britannica. Information conveyed by an encyclopedia should be unbiased, impartial, based on facts, true to the greatest extent, and not anybody's personal opinion. In this light, the article on Hinduism in Encyclopædia Britannica has been examined. The absurd choice of contributors of an article on Hinduism by the authorities of Encyclopædia Britannica will also be analysed. It is felt that Britannica's article on Hinduism is written in a sense that ill-disposes a reader towards Hinduism, whereas this is not the case with Britannica's articles on other religions like Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. After thought and analysis, I have been left with an impression which can be bes t summarized in the following question: Why is Encyclopædia Britannica hostile towards Hinduism?20
... deleted
No comments:
Post a Comment